beamjockey (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
beamjockey) wrote2007-11-26 09:47 pm
beamjockey) wrote2007-11-26 09:47 pm
Entry tags:
How Antimatter Got into Science Fiction
Did you ever wonder how Jack Williamson came to write a series of science fiction stories about antimatter?
1928 Paul Dirac's relativistic treatment of quantum mechanics shows that the positron may exist.
1932 Carl Anderson discovers the positron in cloud-chamber photographs. Physicists speculate about other anti-particles (what we now call antimatter).
1933: Dirac concludes his Nobel Prize lecture by saying: "If we accept the view of complete symmetry between positive and negative electric charge so far as concerns the fundamental laws of Nature, we must regard it rather as an accident that the Earth (and presumably the whole solar system), contains a preponderance of negative electrons and positive protons. It is quite possible that for some of the stars it is the other way about, these stars being built up mainly of positrons and negative protons. In fact, there may be half the stars of each kind. The two kinds of stars would both show exactly the same spectra, and there would be no way of distinguishing them by present astronomical methods."
1935: Vladimir Rojansky speculates that negative-energy "hole" counterparts of protons and neutrons may exist, forming "contraterrene matter." (It seems probable that Rojansky coined this term.)
1937: George Gamow speculates further in his book on nuclear structure.
1940: Rojansky speculates that contraterrene bodies may exist elsewhere in space, possibly including some comets and meteors. Later he suggests looking for an increase in cosmic rays when a comet passes near the Earth.
September 1940: Boaters witness a screaming sound and a mysterious explosion in Long Island Sound. No artillery can be found to account for this.
February 1941: Lincoln LaPaz suggests that contraterrene meteors might explain terrestrial craters where no meteoritic debris is found. Samuel Herrick immediately suggests that the September "Phantom Bertha" event may be an instance of CT impact.
3 March 1941: James Stokely writes "Exploding Atoms Dig Craters?" for Science Service and pop-science readers become aware of the controversy.
April 1941: H.H. Nininger doubts LaPaz. They wrestle.
April 1941: "Reason," Isaac Asimov's second robot story, describes robots as having "positronic" brains, because it sounds cool.
8 April 1941: John W. Campbell, Jr., editor of Astounding Science Fiction, writes a four-page letter to Robert Heinlein. He describes contraterrene physics, then sketches the background to a story about asteroid miners who gather CT material for an energy source.
10 April 1941: Heinlein interested in writing CT story, but, uncomfortable about his ignorance, requests more physics information.
14 April 1941: Campbell cites references for contraterrene matter, offers further speculation about methods of mining CT.
26 April 1941: Heinlein informs Campbell that he has trouble finding a story to fit the CT background, and may drop the project.
May 1941: Heinlein huddles with his atomic physics guru, Robert Cornog of Berkeley, regarding contraterrene matter.
Mid-1941: R.S. Richardson writes article "Inside Out Matter" for the December issue of Astounding Science Fiction.
August 1941: C.C. Wylie weighs in against the CT hypothesis for "Phantom Bertha."
21 November 1941: Campbell writes Jack Williamson "a long letter about CT physics. He outlines a story idea he had offered Heinlein, who isn't going to use it because he has 'more on hand than he wants to write anyway.'"
July 1942: Williamson, writing as "Will Stewart," publishes "Collision Orbit" in Astounding.
November 1942: Stewart's "Minus Sign" in Astounding.
January 1943: "Opposites--React!" in Astounding.
February 1949: First installment of "Seetee Shock" in Astounding.
1951: Setee stories collected in fixup book, "Seetee Ship" from Gnome Press.
Once Williamson had written stories around the idea, antimatter became firmly established in the prop-box of science fiction.
1928 Paul Dirac's relativistic treatment of quantum mechanics shows that the positron may exist.
1932 Carl Anderson discovers the positron in cloud-chamber photographs. Physicists speculate about other anti-particles (what we now call antimatter).
1933: Dirac concludes his Nobel Prize lecture by saying: "If we accept the view of complete symmetry between positive and negative electric charge so far as concerns the fundamental laws of Nature, we must regard it rather as an accident that the Earth (and presumably the whole solar system), contains a preponderance of negative electrons and positive protons. It is quite possible that for some of the stars it is the other way about, these stars being built up mainly of positrons and negative protons. In fact, there may be half the stars of each kind. The two kinds of stars would both show exactly the same spectra, and there would be no way of distinguishing them by present astronomical methods."
1935: Vladimir Rojansky speculates that negative-energy "hole" counterparts of protons and neutrons may exist, forming "contraterrene matter." (It seems probable that Rojansky coined this term.)
1937: George Gamow speculates further in his book on nuclear structure.
1940: Rojansky speculates that contraterrene bodies may exist elsewhere in space, possibly including some comets and meteors. Later he suggests looking for an increase in cosmic rays when a comet passes near the Earth.
September 1940: Boaters witness a screaming sound and a mysterious explosion in Long Island Sound. No artillery can be found to account for this.
February 1941: Lincoln LaPaz suggests that contraterrene meteors might explain terrestrial craters where no meteoritic debris is found. Samuel Herrick immediately suggests that the September "Phantom Bertha" event may be an instance of CT impact.
3 March 1941: James Stokely writes "Exploding Atoms Dig Craters?" for Science Service and pop-science readers become aware of the controversy.
April 1941: H.H. Nininger doubts LaPaz. They wrestle.
April 1941: "Reason," Isaac Asimov's second robot story, describes robots as having "positronic" brains, because it sounds cool.
8 April 1941: John W. Campbell, Jr., editor of Astounding Science Fiction, writes a four-page letter to Robert Heinlein. He describes contraterrene physics, then sketches the background to a story about asteroid miners who gather CT material for an energy source.
10 April 1941: Heinlein interested in writing CT story, but, uncomfortable about his ignorance, requests more physics information.
14 April 1941: Campbell cites references for contraterrene matter, offers further speculation about methods of mining CT.
26 April 1941: Heinlein informs Campbell that he has trouble finding a story to fit the CT background, and may drop the project.
May 1941: Heinlein huddles with his atomic physics guru, Robert Cornog of Berkeley, regarding contraterrene matter.
Mid-1941: R.S. Richardson writes article "Inside Out Matter" for the December issue of Astounding Science Fiction.
August 1941: C.C. Wylie weighs in against the CT hypothesis for "Phantom Bertha."
21 November 1941: Campbell writes Jack Williamson "a long letter about CT physics. He outlines a story idea he had offered Heinlein, who isn't going to use it because he has 'more on hand than he wants to write anyway.'"
July 1942: Williamson, writing as "Will Stewart," publishes "Collision Orbit" in Astounding.
November 1942: Stewart's "Minus Sign" in Astounding.
January 1943: "Opposites--React!" in Astounding.
February 1949: First installment of "Seetee Shock" in Astounding.
1951: Setee stories collected in fixup book, "Seetee Ship" from Gnome Press.
Once Williamson had written stories around the idea, antimatter became firmly established in the prop-box of science fiction.
no subject
I'd say Smith was using the known stable heavy metals, and then implying there are heavier ones with even more unusual properties, and that what little of those there is on Earth will be most likely found mixed with the things chemically like it.
no subject
There had been a lot of work done recently (at the time the story was originally written) separating noble metals in the platinum group. Chemists just kept _finding_ new stuff, the closer they looked at platinum, iridium, etc. So, yeah, a logical place to find something new.
no subject
That makes sense.
no subject
I'm too distracted at the moment to come up with an example, except of courseJourney to the Center of the Earth, and maybe Velikovsky.
no subject
I think Star Trek: TNG gave it a new lease on life in the 1990s.