now the really sad part - i had this same thought earlier today. instead of bailing out the mortgage holders (banks), bail out the mortgages (residents).
but it appears, from the comments here, that there's a major mathematical flaw in this idea.
Under the 'no question is a stupid question' clause, what am I missing? How is using taxpayer money to pay taxpayers any worse than using taxpayer money to pay companies?
no subject
but it appears, from the comments here, that there's a major mathematical flaw in this idea.
Under the 'no question is a stupid question' clause, what am I missing? How is using taxpayer money to pay taxpayers any worse than using taxpayer money to pay companies?