ext_89686 ([identity profile] curiousalexa.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] beamjockey 2008-09-26 01:21 am (UTC)

now the really sad part - i had this same thought earlier today. instead of bailing out the mortgage holders (banks), bail out the mortgages (residents).

but it appears, from the comments here, that there's a major mathematical flaw in this idea.

Under the 'no question is a stupid question' clause, what am I missing? How is using taxpayer money to pay taxpayers any worse than using taxpayer money to pay companies?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting